Least favorite person(s) to play Coven Game Night with, explain with details.

vagabonddaniel-recordedarchives:

All right, buckle up: 

Armand is great to have on my team when we’re playing team games: pictionary, Cranium, games like that. But when it comes to games with bankers or score keepers, he’s been known to cheat. Also, he and Lestat are impossible when they’re playing against each other. 

Lestat likes to win, and when he’s not winning, he likes to argue the rules and twist them into something that might benefit him. 

Louis is just unbeatable about poker. That’s his super power. He’s also damn good at Scrabble. So is David Talbot. 

Marius is great at board games and strategy games, but not so much with video games. He just slams his buttons around. Even if it’s not a fighting game. Even in Mario Party. Marius is also not awesome at pictionary, which is ironic, I know. 

Sybelle hums a lot. A lot. No matter the game, no matter whose turn. It’s either an unconscious tick or a genius strategy to drive everyone else up the wall. If so, it works. 

Gabrielle tries to take prisoners. Even in Monopoly. Even in Ticket to Ride. She actually hijacked my train route from Little Rock to New Orleans once, claiming that she was “robbing” the train and stealing the route. Yeah. She doesn’t fuck around. 

top 5 things you like about daniel molloy

moral-cipher:

Again, in no particular order:

1. His intelligence. The way he is never content unless he has figured something out or discussed it from every aspect matches my own, and although we may both occasionally annoy each other, I would not be without our discussions for the world. Daniel has a fierce curiosity and a razor sharp wit, as well as a surprisingly large repertoire of literary and other references, which includes classical works as well as the twentieth and twentyfirst centuries. He is always able to take me off guard.

2. His fearlessness and his seemingly effortless ability to face the world head on. Though never cruel, he pulls no punches, either with himself or with others, and is not prone to the self deceptions or elaborate rationalisations which so many of our kind seem to have espoused. This more than anything gives me confidence in his ability to withstand the passing of the years without breaking under their burden.

3. His strange but indomitable sense of humour. Daniel can find something to laugh at in the very worst of situations, and even the smallest of everyday actions may be imbued with a strange kind of wit. I hope it may make his immortality easier to bear, as merely being in his company has made mine.

4. His beauty.

5. His ability to love me. As much as I’ve chided him for his morbid romanticism, I must nevertheless be grateful for his decision to run towards the monster, as it were, rather than away from it. Had he chosen otherwise, I would doubtless have remained as I was – unknown, unloved, unloveable, a drifting revenant preying on humans but hidden from them, until eventually I ceased to desire life.

If scientists could develop an artificial blood that could sustain you would you use it? would you stop killing completely or alternate them?

thelionscrimsonclaws:

Part of the pleasure isn’t just in the blood…it’s the fine art of killing, the thrill of the hunt, the struggle, the thoughts that only my fangs in an artery can conjure. Nothing artificial can replace all of that.

Besides, I no longer thirst like some newborn fledgling and I am discriminating in my tastes. I hunt big game. The gators that lay in wait beneath the still waters, the widows in the crevices, the asp in the grass…the truly vile souls that you never see coming and will never be brought to trial.

They vanish without a trace and you want to know why? I’m the boogeyman’s boogeyman….and I’m hiding under their beds.

I may be fiction but I like to keep it real, baby!

Poor David putting up with so so many brats. It is as though no one takes you seriously and sees it perfectly fine to antagonise you! Just go ahead …spank one of them. Don’t be talk and no action. Do you think then you’d get some respect?

the-gentleman-chronicler:

Dear Anon – I don’t think you quite understand how this lot operates.

If I were to go ahead and spank one of them, I wouldn’t get respect so much as I’d likely get a line of them out the door waiting for a turn.  Quite the group of masochists in this nighttime world of immortality.  Never considered that when I was writing reports on them for the Talamasca.

Do you regret missing so much of the 1900’s? The 1920’s, 30’s, 60’s and 70’s especially?

thelionscrimsonclaws:

I think I could have dazzled in the 20′s and 30′s!  I would have thrown lavish parties that lasted for weeks, mingled with writers and artists of the era, delighted in the spread of Jazz, and made another fortune running gin, whiskey, rum, moonshine and vodka up and down the coast.  I would have rubbed elbows with Capone, Maranzano, Luciano….perhaps they would have even given me some sort of nickname hmm?

As for the 60′s and 70′s, it was quite the tumultuous time….I don’t really care for much of the fashion but I would have found a great deal of enjoyment in the art and music.  I would have also been a regular at Studio 54 and then CBGB’s (in the eighties, I did visit CBGB’s often when in NYC).  I would have thrown myself into music and probably would have started recording much earlier than the eighties.  The drug culture was interesting as well and it might have been fun to experiment a bit more….I would have loved meeting Jim Morrison, Jimi Hendrix, Janis Joplin, David Bowie (Ziggy Stardust phase).

However, the aesthetic of these eras have lasted throughout our brief history, thanks to the leaps and bounds made in preservation, and aside from the dead, we can revisit each as often as we like. 

Did you know that the Romans used lead in their food? Also in cups, bowls, and for various other things. Not only was it highly poisonous but it caused hallucinations and (tehe) sexual arousal. Perhaps Marius could go into more detail?

mariusmymaster:

devilsfool:

While I appreciate your historical attention to detail, I’m afraid this doesn’t really apply to me, my dear. 

What a strange question to ask our dear Lestat. My great city existed well before even his ancestors were conceived, and thus I doubt he would be a very knowledgeable fount on this subject. 

The people of Rome knew that lead must be dangerous, as we were not blind to the ailments that seemed to follow those who worked in casting lead. They breathed in the caustic fumes and were left pallid and sickly, and from this we gathered that lead must be rather unwholesome. 

Although lead was widely accepted as a dangerous metal, many still believed it to be necessary in some aspects. It was used to line aqueducts and fashioned into pipes–nevermind that clay pipes were entirely more sought after, even by those such as myself who were rich enough to afford otherwise. Medicines and cosmetics as well were made of great quantities of lead, despite the wide belief that it should not be ingested directly if at all possible. Some greats such as Pliny and Columella argued that in leaden vessels was the only way to prepare Defrutum, a sweet syrup used to make products such as wine more desirable. 

Many attest that a rise in lead poisoning stemming from the Roman’s love for wine was perhaps a cause of the empire’s decline, though there is little evidence to support this. It is true that lead poisoning would have greatly impacted the sperm count of adult males, or the ability to carry a child in females, and even would have been fatal to the children themselves–as wine was the predominant drink for all citizens, regardless of age–but this means very little when you realize the people of Rome had no interest in rearing children, or even marriage. In fact, it came to a point where the people were so focused on a childless state, that Agustus himself attempted to intervene, much to no avail. 

As for the sexual arousal, I can only speak from personal experience. My sex drive was what I assume to be average for a man my age. I sought a wife early on, I sought to make love, and I sought to be loved. I never happened upon any urges that were out of the ordinary, or struggled with a drive for physical contact more mighty than I could handle–though, some of those who read Armand’s poor account of Venice may greatly disagree. Of course, by then my need for mortal sexual intercourse had long been dead, and I base my words solely on the desire for something greater: the sharing of immortal blood. 

*mic drop*

Ok so like, howwwwww …. does your vampire body know to grow your hair back, and to the same length. Like, you talk about vamps cutting their hair and then it grows back, which, ok, whatever, but then how does your body know when to STOP growing it. Like, uh oh, better add a few more inches for Claudia, but Armand only had a bob when he died, can’t go over that. How would it know?

merciful-death:

I stopped questioning these things many years ago.  I have no idea why it is that way.  It simply is.

image

pic of Santiago non-con petting Louis’ hair bc of reasons


I think the vampiric parasite (Amel) analyzes the blueprint of the host’s body when it’s installed and it then immediately uninstalls the features it doesn’t need (e.g. internal reproductive organs). It then starts converting all the organic matter of the host body into its own substance to “perfect it” into the pure supernatural killing machine that it wants to be. 

In that sense, that initial blueprint probably indicates length of hair, beard growth, muscle shape and position, etc., at time of death, and those are elements that the vampiric parasite program respects and wants to maintain as it continues to “update” its host body. It could be detrimental if a vampire shaved its head and then was stuck like that for eternity. The external appearance of the host body will affect its ability to hunt, and thus, preserve itself. It’s in the parasite’s interest for the host to continue to survive so that it can, too.

However, if the vampire had shaved as a mortal before turning, then that would be maintained.

BTW, about nails:

The nail growth part of vampire mythology seems to stem from how corpses tended to shrivel from dessication in their coffins after death, hence, making it appear that their fingernails had grown longer. Although I think hair does continue to grow for a short while after death? I’m not sure. 

What’s been the hardest thing to adjust to as a vampire?

the-gentleman-chronicler:

First and foremost, the hunger has been the hardest adjustment I’ve had to make as a vampire.  What few vices I indulged in my mortality were never so prevalent – not to the point where I felt so commanded to answer the desire for them.  I could control them.  Yet the hunger is in control of me more than I am of it.  I’m not used to being slave to something inside myself.  That experience is new for me.

Another adjustment is certainly the sense of time.  When I was alive I measured the passage of days, months, years with regular habit.  Even if it was just noting the date upon a newspaper.  I observed time, I respected it, and felt very keen about the necessity to keep track.  Now, it occasionally surprises me when I hear a date.  The nights tend to blend together.  I feel outside of time in a way I’d never done when alive.  It doesn’t feel so oppressive or so precious to me anymore.

There are many other aspects of adjustment I’ve had to make since my turning yet these two are by far the most major developments that I consider worth mentioning.

+ Ever regret not jumping Lestat’s bones on that boat while he was mortal and in your soon-to-be-body?

the-gentleman-chronicler:

Looking back on it now, despite my moral conflict over the idea of bedding such a youthful body, and concerned about my failing in being able to deliver any satisfaction to Lestat with mine, I do regret not engaging in that intimacy with him back then.  It would have created all manner of additional difficulties for us.

The friendship we shared certainly couldn’t have survived the encounter without becoming something deeper.  I did want Lestat, no shame in saying so, and if I had given in to my desire for him then I doubt recovering from it would be an option.  He has been (mostly) careful about engaging me in attempts for intimacy since my turning.  Out of respect for me or due to his own concerns, I cannot say.

He is dangerous for me.  By giving into my lust even once I fear that I would become fixated on exploring it further.  And since I cannot even promise that any such attempt wouldn’t end in disaster, who knows whether it will ever come to pass.