merciful-death:

annabellioncourt:

Hello! Sorry to bother you, I’ve been following you for a while and from your blog I can tell you’re very into the Vampire Chronicles. I just finished Interview with the Vampire and I just started The Vampire Lestat and I’m very confused and I thought you could answer my question if you had the time. I’m very confused because it seems like The Vampire Lestat is set after Interview and Lestat has a VERY different personality than he does during Interview. As I’m reading it doesn’t seem like they are the same person. For example in Interview Lestat is very blood thirsty and only cares for himself but in The Vampire Lestat he waits around for a human to kill, but specifically one whose killed other people and shows no remorse about it. This doesn’t sound like Lestat, more like something Louis would do. Did Anne Rice slightly switch up his personality? It seems like he is a lot more softer than in the last book. Thank you for your time!!

asked by earlysunsetsovermikeyway

I asked permission to make this into a text post because wow, one: it is a common confusion, one that most readers go through, and two: there’s no short answer to it.

For starters, yes, The Vampire Lestat (TVL) takes place after Interview With the Vampire (IWTV), but after the opening of Lestat waking up in the modern world and putting together his band, it jumps back into a flashback that makes up the bulk of the novel–starting with his human life in 16th century France, to his becoming a vampire and onward (I won’t tell you more exact details as spoilers I don’t know how much of it you’ve gotten through yet). By the end of the few hundred page long flashback you’re in present day with his band and the vampires who aren’t too happy about the fact that he’s out there screaming their secrets to the world.

Lestat is much kinder in this one, much more emotional and “softer” as you say, than he is in IWTV because this time he’s the one telling the story. Louis never asked and Lestat never thought to tell the deeper truths and realities of his behavior and Louis chose to believe that he was a villain, because in my opinion, it was the easiest thing for Loius–if he saw Lestat as evil then his hatred of him, his abandonment of him, the hiding of his murder at their daughter’s hands could all e justified. Louis, though claiming he’s not religious, has a highly religious mindset, he’s nearly obsessed with morality thinking that the more he clings to it the more he can also cling to his mortality as well. 

Louis told the truth as he saw it, and in his deep melancholia everything he saw was darker than it seemed to be, even without his coping mechanism of coloring everyone around him as dark as he logically could to make himself seem more human by contrast (as the series goes on, Louis becomes fascinating because he is so detached from the vampires, and never uses the powers that vampires gain with age, that he’s just this being of raw power, stronger than most vampires. He becomes by the time of the last book both the most mortal and the least mortal at once out of the coven. He’s terrifying in his complexity, his ruthlessness mirrored in his mercy).

TVL is very much just Lestat going “Hold on! This is NOT what happened, let me tell you MY side of things and you’ll know what REALLY happened,” and if you’ve grown up with siblings or have ever seen an episode of a cartoon/sitcom where the same plot was shown through different points of view but changed the events drastically….that’s what this is. This is Lestat presenting his “I am not an idiot evil drama vamp, I am the endlessly clever just-as-depressed-as-Louis but in different ways Brat Prince.” But he’s also a drama queen.

In fact, he’s such a drama queen (literally, he was an actor once, theatre was his passion) that lying, bending the truth, exaggerating…it all comes second nature to him. I doubt that TVL is the exact truth, I doubt Lestat’s story telling because he–just like Louis, Armand, David, Marius, all of them–are not reliable narrators.

Lestat became my favorite narrator and character in the series by the time that I finished the book, partially because of his flair for the extravagant in his writing. Louis speaks like a slow violin occasionally screaming against the bowstring, firelight, dark red wine, fine black suits and the sound of dust gathering in antique colonial mansions. Lestat speaks like free-flowing drink, a loud symphony orchestra that still has those quiet violins constantly crying away though often overlooked, in the frenzied high of someone addicted to being under the spotlight.

Anne Rice might have decided to change his personality in order to write the second book but her characters are closer to how they’re portrayed in TVL than they are in IWTV (with the exception of Armand–Lestat’s attitude towards Armand is amusing, his claims of hating the little twerp gave me life when reading it the first time).

Thank you so much for asking me, I had a lot of fun answering it, and I hope that I was of some help!

i-want-my-iwtv could probably help as well! the fandom is very kind, active, and open despite its small size and many of them will be more than willing to give their perspective!

ooc; Reblogging because spot on post is spot on.  This is how I’ve always described it as well–Louis told his story exactly as he saw it.

annabellioncourt: #PERFECT JUST PERFECT!

None of them are reliable narrators. This is true.

Louis did ask Lestat, often, about Lestat’s maker, their origin as a species, whether vampires were meant to serve Satan, etc. and Lestat had been unable to answer him during IWTV for various reasons that are explained in TVL. The fact that Claudia also asked these questions and was also not given answers was another reason she grew to distrust Lestat, for his refusal to give them even a scrap. 

The joke about Lestat calling Louis “Merciful Death!” was because at that time, Louis was so merciful towards humans that he chose animal blood just to avoid taking human life. As Lestat mentions, it’s not living, it’s surviving, to do that, and it certainly contributed to Louis’ gloom and misery during that time period.

Ok so like, howwwwww …. does your vampire body know to grow your hair back, and to the same length. Like, you talk about vamps cutting their hair and then it grows back, which, ok, whatever, but then how does your body know when to STOP growing it. Like, uh oh, better add a few more inches for Claudia, but Armand only had a bob when he died, can’t go over that. How would it know?

merciful-death:

I stopped questioning these things many years ago.  I have no idea why it is that way.  It simply is.

image

pic of Santiago non-con petting Louis’ hair bc of reasons


I think the vampiric parasite (Amel) analyzes the blueprint of the host’s body when it’s installed and it then immediately uninstalls the features it doesn’t need (e.g. internal reproductive organs). It then starts converting all the organic matter of the host body into its own substance to “perfect it” into the pure supernatural killing machine that it wants to be. 

In that sense, that initial blueprint probably indicates length of hair, beard growth, muscle shape and position, etc., at time of death, and those are elements that the vampiric parasite program respects and wants to maintain as it continues to “update” its host body. It could be detrimental if a vampire shaved its head and then was stuck like that for eternity. The external appearance of the host body will affect its ability to hunt, and thus, preserve itself. It’s in the parasite’s interest for the host to continue to survive so that it can, too.

However, if the vampire had shaved as a mortal before turning, then that would be maintained.

BTW, about nails:

The nail growth part of vampire mythology seems to stem from how corpses tended to shrivel from dessication in their coffins after death, hence, making it appear that their fingernails had grown longer. Although I think hair does continue to grow for a short while after death? I’m not sure. 

merciful-death

lestatdelight:

merciful-death:

lestatdelight-archive-deactivat:

Send me an URL on anon and I will talk about the mun!

//Oh!!! YEEEES! I love them! They are extremely kind, sweet and cool! Having a thread with them would be amazing ❤ They have done loooots of things for the fandom and I am grateful about that. AH they are gorgeous!

ooc; YOU ARE SO FUCKING NICE.

//And so are you!

♥ #VC fandom love

misery-andecstasy:

merciful-death:

ooc; I actually went back to look up the part where David says he’s afraid of bees and I completely forgot that he also said the whole fucking Talamasca is unnerved by them

/WAYS TO FIGHT the-talamasca

/UNLEASH ALL THE BEES

image
image

vagabonddaniel:

merciful-death:

ooc; For anyone that wondered, this was a thing on her Facebook today.  Both the vampires not having sex and the Daniel & Marius bit.

//Awww. That’s sweet. (Not sarcastic. It is.) I definitely got the impression they cared very much for each other in PL. I still don’t read it as a romantic relationship. I don’t know it, it just doesn’t feel that way to me in the text. But I can see it being a very loving and intimate relationship. If it gets passionate, though, I see there being problems, given that Marius is so controlling and Daniel does not like being controlled. Will be interesting to see how this goes in Blood Paradise

I do hope Armand and Daniel reconnect in some meaningful way (which doesn’t have to be at the expense of Dan’s relationship with Marius, whatever that is – I contend they’re not very monogamous creatures anyhow). But really, I just want to see them TALK, goddamn it. Nod at each other. SOMETHING. 

#want #I want this bc of reasons

What would YOU do if you and lestat switched bodies?

merciful-death:

I cannot even fathom that situation.  I can only imagine that I would be immensely irritated at how such a thing would come to occur.  I would inevitably have to babysit Lestat to ensure nothing embarrassing terrible would occur throughout the duration of him possessing my body.

But, to simplify it…

image