What
interests me about this object, in particular, is the one tiny,
spinning blade that we can just make out at its center. It made me
realize how very basic the demands of function can be in design (a
blender just needs a blade and a tube for it to spin in) and how little
they really condition the look of a thing.
The idea that function
and form are or need to be closely related is probably mostly myth;
every designer, no matter how functionalist, has vast latitude in the
look that he or she gives to an object.
Muller-Munk’s “Blendor,
Model B” comes at a lovely moment when decoration and use are in
particular tension: The appliance’s roots in Art Deco ornament are
perfectly clear, but so are its leanings toward the machine-age
esthetics of the new, streamlined “Moderne” style. Whether it matters or
not to how we blend drinks, Muller-Munk’s piece looks like it would
pass any wind-tunnel test. (Private collection; photo, Dallas Museum of Art)
Does anyone follow AR on FB who knows if she’s mentioned anyone she might like? I don’t always agree with her reccs on this topic, tho. She wanted Matthew Bomer for Louis and I just can’t agree. Yes, he looks great in a suit, and he’s cute and all, but he’s too manly, he has a kind of ballsy confidence that’s overshooting Louis.
i-want-my-iwtv So, back in 2010 she named Simon Woods for Armand (and Matthew MacFadyen for Marius, along with Richard Armitage for Lestat and Matt Bomer for Louis, god help us).
Here’s Simon Woods and Matthew MacFadyen (yes, yes, we are talking Mr. Bingley and Mr. Darcy lol)…