merciful-death:

annabellioncourt:

Hello! Sorry to bother you, I’ve been following you for a while and from your blog I can tell you’re very into the Vampire Chronicles. I just finished Interview with the Vampire and I just started The Vampire Lestat and I’m very confused and I thought you could answer my question if you had the time. I’m very confused because it seems like The Vampire Lestat is set after Interview and Lestat has a VERY different personality than he does during Interview. As I’m reading it doesn’t seem like they are the same person. For example in Interview Lestat is very blood thirsty and only cares for himself but in The Vampire Lestat he waits around for a human to kill, but specifically one whose killed other people and shows no remorse about it. This doesn’t sound like Lestat, more like something Louis would do. Did Anne Rice slightly switch up his personality? It seems like he is a lot more softer than in the last book. Thank you for your time!!

asked by earlysunsetsovermikeyway

I asked permission to make this into a text post because wow, one: it is a common confusion, one that most readers go through, and two: there’s no short answer to it.

For starters, yes, The Vampire Lestat (TVL) takes place after Interview With the Vampire (IWTV), but after the opening of Lestat waking up in the modern world and putting together his band, it jumps back into a flashback that makes up the bulk of the novel–starting with his human life in 16th century France, to his becoming a vampire and onward (I won’t tell you more exact details as spoilers I don’t know how much of it you’ve gotten through yet). By the end of the few hundred page long flashback you’re in present day with his band and the vampires who aren’t too happy about the fact that he’s out there screaming their secrets to the world.

Lestat is much kinder in this one, much more emotional and “softer” as you say, than he is in IWTV because this time he’s the one telling the story. Louis never asked and Lestat never thought to tell the deeper truths and realities of his behavior and Louis chose to believe that he was a villain, because in my opinion, it was the easiest thing for Loius–if he saw Lestat as evil then his hatred of him, his abandonment of him, the hiding of his murder at their daughter’s hands could all e justified. Louis, though claiming he’s not religious, has a highly religious mindset, he’s nearly obsessed with morality thinking that the more he clings to it the more he can also cling to his mortality as well. 

Louis told the truth as he saw it, and in his deep melancholia everything he saw was darker than it seemed to be, even without his coping mechanism of coloring everyone around him as dark as he logically could to make himself seem more human by contrast (as the series goes on, Louis becomes fascinating because he is so detached from the vampires, and never uses the powers that vampires gain with age, that he’s just this being of raw power, stronger than most vampires. He becomes by the time of the last book both the most mortal and the least mortal at once out of the coven. He’s terrifying in his complexity, his ruthlessness mirrored in his mercy).

TVL is very much just Lestat going “Hold on! This is NOT what happened, let me tell you MY side of things and you’ll know what REALLY happened,” and if you’ve grown up with siblings or have ever seen an episode of a cartoon/sitcom where the same plot was shown through different points of view but changed the events drastically….that’s what this is. This is Lestat presenting his “I am not an idiot evil drama vamp, I am the endlessly clever just-as-depressed-as-Louis but in different ways Brat Prince.” But he’s also a drama queen.

In fact, he’s such a drama queen (literally, he was an actor once, theatre was his passion) that lying, bending the truth, exaggerating…it all comes second nature to him. I doubt that TVL is the exact truth, I doubt Lestat’s story telling because he–just like Louis, Armand, David, Marius, all of them–are not reliable narrators.

Lestat became my favorite narrator and character in the series by the time that I finished the book, partially because of his flair for the extravagant in his writing. Louis speaks like a slow violin occasionally screaming against the bowstring, firelight, dark red wine, fine black suits and the sound of dust gathering in antique colonial mansions. Lestat speaks like free-flowing drink, a loud symphony orchestra that still has those quiet violins constantly crying away though often overlooked, in the frenzied high of someone addicted to being under the spotlight.

Anne Rice might have decided to change his personality in order to write the second book but her characters are closer to how they’re portrayed in TVL than they are in IWTV (with the exception of Armand–Lestat’s attitude towards Armand is amusing, his claims of hating the little twerp gave me life when reading it the first time).

Thank you so much for asking me, I had a lot of fun answering it, and I hope that I was of some help!

i-want-my-iwtv could probably help as well! the fandom is very kind, active, and open despite its small size and many of them will be more than willing to give their perspective!

ooc; Reblogging because spot on post is spot on.  This is how I’ve always described it as well–Louis told his story exactly as he saw it.

annabellioncourt: #PERFECT JUST PERFECT!

None of them are reliable narrators. This is true.

Louis did ask Lestat, often, about Lestat’s maker, their origin as a species, whether vampires were meant to serve Satan, etc. and Lestat had been unable to answer him during IWTV for various reasons that are explained in TVL. The fact that Claudia also asked these questions and was also not given answers was another reason she grew to distrust Lestat, for his refusal to give them even a scrap. 

The joke about Lestat calling Louis “Merciful Death!” was because at that time, Louis was so merciful towards humans that he chose animal blood just to avoid taking human life. As Lestat mentions, it’s not living, it’s surviving, to do that, and it certainly contributed to Louis’ gloom and misery during that time period.

Hello! After years of re-reading the first 3 books, I am about to start book 4, ttotbt. However, I was looking at the order of books on Wikipedia and I noticed Pandora and Vittorio are kind of separate? When should I read them so that the series is in order?((your blog is PERFECT, by the way))

((My blog is perfect, indeed. Pffft must pretend to have some level of humility! Thank u *u* ))

image

Starting TOBT, you’re still on the more sane side of canon. JUST YOU WAIT.

When to read Pandora and Vittorio? That’s a good question. Other ppl may have different answers for you, so anyone feel free to reblog this w/ commentary or send me a message on this.

Pandora

This is the story of Pandora, who was with Marius for quite some time, so I would read this one right before Blood and Gold (which is Marius’ story) so that her perspective is fresh in your mind when Marius starts talking smack about her. AR wrote Blood and Gold after Pandora, so she had to keep that information in mind, too.

Vittorio

HONESTLY, I don’t see that Vittorio really fits into canon at all, I think the Coven of the Articulate are mentioned briefly in his book? His story won’t spoil any of the other books, bc it’s completely separate from theirs, so I’d leave it till later. After Blood and Gold. Maybe even after Prince Lestat, since he’s not in that book, either.


When I started the series, the first 4 had already been published, and I read the fresh VC in the order they were released. This meant that I read Pandora between MtD and TVA, not really ideal placement, as, if I recall correctly, she has only brief cameos in those. I read Vittorio between TVA and Merrick, and I don’t think he appears in either.

Back then we read everything immediately, fearing every VC novel would be the last; trying times. Hope this helped ^______^

Gallery

#PERFECT JUST PERFECT

image

annabellioncourt said: 

YES. YES. That’s got to be one of the best lines in the movie, I laugh every time I watch it. And now I will be using that tag.

Gallery

When I finished the VC I didn’t know if I could emotionally invest myself in another series ever again.
I hope you enjoy this tomfoolery!! ^^ love, yaknow-prince

Your fanart is beauteous, I love it, #PERFECT JUST PERFECT, heaps of praise! #claiming u in the name of our fandom.

Gallery

shotfromguns:

cloudsinvenice:

Credit: le boyfriend, inspired by dandelioncourt​‘s meme.

i-want-my-iwtv

Claudia, talent, u has it. He’s the heart of the ocean. With boobs. 

How on earth do you pronounce Louis’ last name? I have never really knew how to pronounce it. To be honest his last name is a mouthful.

takemetocoffin-or-losemeforever:

i-want-my-iwtv:

♛“Pssssst: that’s not the only thing about him that’s a mouthful.” 

image

Alright *shoves Lestat aside* to answer your question: How to pronounce Louis de Pointe du Lac: you’re lucky I took French in high school which has been EVER so useful to me in my adult life. NOT.

  • Louis: “Loo-wee”, with less emphasis on the “wee” part.
  • de: “dih,” means “from” in French.
  • Pointe: “Pwan” with almost no emphasis on the “n,” means  “tip.”
  • du: “due,” means “of.”
  • Lac: “Lack,” means, “lake.”

BRING IT ALL TOGETHER! Emphasis on Pointe and Lac bc of reasons.

“Loo-wee dih Pwan due

Lack,” “Louis from the tip of the lake.”

This has been your French lesson.

With the blessing of i-want-my-ivtv (praise be to you Uncle Lestan!) and one
shoulder left (sword-mishandling during a blessing happens a lot more than you
can imagine)
, here’s a
little tutorial on how to pronounce Louis’ name.

Warning: strong French accent incoming.

IT GOT BETTER. your French accent is impeccable. PARFAIT JUSTE PARFAIT. am I gonna need to coerce you into pronouncing more stuff properly in French hmmmmm?… also you pronounced Lestat the way I prefer, too, none of this weird Germanic “Les-DOT” crap Mater tries to get us to do.