is it true that brad pitt hated doing interview with a vampire? did he not get along well with people? whats the story there?

He did hate it! But that’s part of what made him so perfect! 

image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image

In no particular order, some of Brad’s grievances were:

  • He was miserable with the filming schedule which basically demanded filming at night and sleeping during the day. Seasonal affective disorder maybe?
  • Much of what he loved about his character in the book was different in the script, which he didn’t even see until 2 weeks before filming started. 
  • IIRC, he didn’t get along with Tom but more bc Tom was absent than that he was difficult. Apparently, Tom would show up to film his scenes and not stick around before or after to socialize with anyone (remember, he had 2 young kids then, so I would assume he wanted to spend time with them).

For a little window into Brad’s experience, in his own words, hit the jump.

Brad Pitt, in an article by Mike Scott, NOLA.com | The Times-Picayune:

“I’m telling you, one day it broke me. It was like, ‘Life’s too short for this quality of life.’ I called David Geffen, who was a good friend. He was a producer, and he’d just come to visit. I said, ‘David, I can’t do this anymore. I can’t do it. What will it cost me to get out?’ And he goes, very calmly, ‘Forty million dollars.’ And I go, ‘OK, thank you.’ It actually took the anxiety off of me. I was like, ‘I’ve got to man up and ride this through, and that’s what I’m going to do.’”

…Still, he says he doesn’t necessarily regret “Interview with a Vampire.”

“I don’t lament the failures,” he said. “The failures prepare you for the next one. It’s a step you needed to take, and I’m all for it.”


Also, the script:

“Another big problem was the script, which was written by Rice herself, taking her first shot at writing a screenplay. Pitt hadn’t seen it until two weeks before shooting started. When he finally did get a copy, he realized that everything in Rice’s book that was interesting about his character … was gone.

And so here he was, a rising young actor and budding sex symbol, stuck in an uninteresting, passive role.

“In the book you have this guy asking, ‘Who am I?’ Which was probably applicable to me at that time: ‘Am I good? Am I of the angels? Am I bad? Am I of the devil?’ In the book it is a guy going on this search of discovery. And in the meantime, he has this Lestat character that he’s entranced by and abhors. … In the movie, they took the sensational aspects of Lestat and made that the pulse of the film, and those things are very enjoyable and very good, but for me, there was just nothing to do — you just sit and watch.”


Getting along with Tom:

“You gotta understand, Tom and I are … we walk in different directions.” says Pitt. “I always thought there was this underlying competition that got in the way of any real conversation… it bugged me a bit.”


But they clearly get along now at least for the cameras but it looks pretty legit. they were even talking about working together on a movie about a year ago.

image

immortanjoes:

Louis

Finished today for mrdolarhyde

“In a kitchen garden I saw something, something that had only been vague in my thoughts until I had my hands on it. It was a small scythe, its sharp curved blade still caked with green weeds from the last mowing. And once I’d wiped it clean and run my finger along the sharp blade, it was as if my plan came clear to me and I could move fast to my other errands…” – Louis de Pointe du Lac, Interview with the Vampire

I was wondering if there is an official signature for Lestat? I know that it’s described in the books, but I was curious if AR released something.

No, not that I know of, but paolammmartinez did this one which looks like smtg he might have done:

image

It’s not as elaborate as I would imagine his signature to really be though:

“… Lestat does everything in a big way-covers half the page with his magnificent lettering… “ – David Talbot, Queen of the Damned

witchyrem-ains adds:

I believe I read an article about illiteracy that said people who were illiterate into adulthood have far better hand writing than those who learned at a young age. I believe it’s because they valued it more and tended to treat it as a ‘gift’ or ‘art’.

garama
replied to your photoset “witchyrem-ains requested this, since the original source was garama‘s…”

OHmygod I had forgotten this completely……….. maybe i should re-draw this thingy. I’m totally open for suggestions for their outfits/clothing! (And yes, I’m okay with this post!)

Thank u so much for permission! We have so few group VC fanarts, this is one of my fave, whether u decide to redraw it or not, it’s still great. 

(As I mentioned to garama privately, there are fandom ppl on tumblr now who never got to enjoy his magnificent fanart from years ago, so it is a fandom duty of mine to share the wealth, so to speak! <3)

hyperbeeb:

high-fructose-lesbianism:

#vampireboy

That is an awful legacy of names! Lestat and also Alucard aka that name low budget horror films would use when they couldn’t buy the rights to dracula/subtly foreshadow the fact that their character was a vampire shhh secret though. I want a fucking reality tv series of #vampireboy

It must be strange growing up with a fictional character’s name, especially as a “Lestat” baby. Whenever I mention the series there’s a chance I’ll get negativity bc there’s still homophobia out there, etc. I actually do try to bring it up relatively soon when deciding on making a new friend, bc if they reveal themselves to be homophobic or otherwise treat the VC like it’s shameful in any regard, then I don’t really want to waste my time with that person.

But I don’t think I could name a future son of mine "Lestat.“ Maybe I’d choose one of the more normal names, and there are plenty! I’ve seen alot of cat and dog (and apparently there’s a mule in NOLA?) Lestats, and a few young boys named Lestat on the interwebs. Kids will tease anyone for any reason, having a strange name won’t help this "Lestat-Armon Alucard.”

Noteworthy: I met a little Akasha (2 yrs old!) at a booksigning. She definitely lived up to the name, throwing such a tantrum that she had to be removed from the building by her father, she never got to meet her maker AR.

image

(^This is not her mom in the pic. Just a fan thrilled to hold Akasha in her arms!)

Hello! So, I’m currently reading The Vampire Armand and I’ve read some articles that put Prince Lestat next to it on the TVC reading order. Do u think I can read PL after TVA or would it be better to read it after BC, following the publishing order?

Hello to you! PL is meant as a branching-off of canon… so there are plot points and characters in BC that don’t exist in PL. PL is like an AU, if things had gone in a different direction after MtD.

If you really want to read PL, go ahead, right after TVA!

BUT: PL is not my favorite VC… and there will be characters in the story that you won’t be familiar with. PL tries to give some background on them, but it feels more like telling than showing :- You’ll probably have a richer, more layered understanding of them if you read the books that follow TVA first. 

That’s alot of books to deal with, so if I had to make you read just one, at least read Blood and Gold before PL. 

Hi most beautiful of the beautiful :* I have kinda sorta read that you ship Louis and Lestat pretty hard (and who doesn’t) so what do you say to Anne Rice seemingly forgetting about Louis once in a while? I mean, he’s been on a pretty low profile in many of the books, unless I missed something?

annabellioncourt:

i-want-my-iwtv:

Why thank u dear, such a lovely compliment! I shall have to post more selfies… unless u are referring to my inner beauty of which I have an abundance *u*

I do ship L/L! Absolutely! However did u guess?? sometimes Louis doesn’t ship them but thats fine bc nobody ships L/L as hard as Lestat ships L/L.

image

[fanart by FiestaTB ]

ANYWAY: Why u no write so much Louis, Anne Rice?

image

[memeything by vampchronfic]

I don’t remember when exactly, but I think AR did call Louis a “damaged pilgrim” at one point. There’s that.

If you want to cry over Louis, read Merrick, if you haven’t already. He has a lead role in that one ;] But be prepared because your feels will be squarely hit.

Hit the jump for my thoughts on why we don’t get much Louis action post-IWTV.

Keep reading

(ok because Louis spoke in English, and the French followed MOST of the same patterns in literary history, I’m going to base this mostly with British literature)

Yep! Louis manner of talking was much more flowery. It was lush and decorative without the higher philosophical trappings of the earlier 1800′s. Louis is more along the lines of the Oscar Wilde’s era of the very late 19th century, which is what most people think of today when they think “Victorian writing.” Similar in voice (though not subject) would also be Matthew Arnold (read some of his essays, and tell me that’s not how Louis talks), Wilkie Collins, and Henry James.

The trade mark of the era was the fading out in popularity of language for the sake of language: the British (and to a lesser extent the French) had a love for the intricacy of the language, how it all worked together, and (take a look at Charles Dickens for an Example of this) it would result in using several paragraphs to tell what could be summed up in a couple sentences. 

The realists in France and a few in Russia (as the Russians idolized France in the 1800′s) were starting something new by the close of the century: keeping their prose short, sweet and to the point. With no less artistry they found beauty in a minimalistic approach: instead of “Roses of velvet that matched the shade the rubies dripping from the mark of the asp on Cleopatra’s breast,” for example, it was now “soft, bloody roses.” 

They still evoke the same image, but not the same tone. 

Going back to what this has to do with Louis: he’s not so much involved in human goings on, he’s aware of events and films, but still speaks in the language of the century where he spent the most time communicating with others–also he would not have lost his speech patterns over those decades with Armand because Armand was mostly isolated in his language circles. So we can look at all of that as to why Louis talks the way he does.

I’m sorry if that was incoherent and rambling; I’m cooking and writing at the same time.

^I knew I could count on annabellioncourt for some​​ excellent points ❤ 

She also added: “Louis does show a HEAVY influence from the French symbolist poets (the school that Charles Baudelaire was from).”

Of course Louis would express himself in the language of the writers he enjoyed. OF COURSE HE WOULD. We all know he’s basically a big ol’ bookworm w/ fangs.